UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon has said that differences remain between the two sides in Cyprus concerning the interpretation of the 8 July Agreement, most notably on what constitutes a day-to-day matter, and the mechanism for resolving disagreements.
Despite the fact that the UN Secretary General report on the United Nations Operation in Cyprus has not yet been submitted to the UN Security Council, CNA has been informed that in his report, Ban also said that despite the commitment of the leaders of the two communities in July 2006 to ensuring that the “right atmosphere†prevails for the process to be successful, including by putting an end to the so-called blame game, the two sides continued to engage in mutual recriminations throughout the reporting period.
On July 8, 2006, Cyprus President Tassos Papadopoulos and Turkish Cypriot leader Mehmet Talat, at the presence of the then UN Undersecretary-General for Political Affairs Ibrabim Gambari, reached an agreement providing for the concurrent establishment of working groups to address substantive aspects of the Cyprus problem and technical committees to deal with the day-to-day problems that affect the people, as well as Confidence Building Measures.
According to reliable sources, in his report, Ban also said that over the past six months, his Special Representative to Cyprus Michael Moller has continued efforts aimed at facilitating the implementation of the 8 July Agreement through intensive discussions with the two leaders and their representatives.
“Thus far, fourteen meetings of the Coordinating Committee, comprising the advisers of the two leaders and my Special Representative, have been convened in addition to a number of bilateral meetings between the Special Representative and each side. The main objective of the Coordination Committee has been to agree on the modalities for the launching of the bi-communal working groups which will deal with substantive issues, and the bi-communal technical committees which will discuss issues affecting the day-to-day life of the people,†he added.
The UNSG noted that “there is a broad consensus on the way forward, based on the procedural clarifications and agreements, including preliminary agreement on the list of issues for the technical committees and the working groupsâ€, noting however that “differences remain concerning the interpretation of the Agreement, most notably on what constitutes a day-to-day matter, and the mechanism for resolving disagreements.â€
He added that “although an understanding ad referendum was reached at the Coordination Committee meetings on 9 and 10 March, it foundered on the above points.â€
CAN has learned that Ban also said in his report that “the trend towards increased construction on the Turkish Cypriot side continues to be a cause of concern, as it may complicate efforts towards a comprehensive settlement. UNFICYP received complaints from the Greek Cypriot side that inhabited houses in Rizokarpaso belonging to Greek Cypriots are being demolishedâ€. He noted that UNFICYP has confirmed this and has protested to the Turkish Cypriot side the practice of demolishing houses without the owner’s consent.
He added that UNFICYP personnel faced difficulties accessing the Greek Cypriot community in the Karpas area, with restrictions being placed by local police on home visits without prior clearance adding that UNFICYP has protested these new restrictions.
Ban expressed the firm belief that the responsibility of finding a solution to the Cyprus problem lies first and foremost with the Cypriots themselves, noting that the UN remains committed to supporting a political process and facilitating reconciliation.
Referring to the EU aid package for the Turkish Cypriot community, Ban said that “the purpose of this assistance is to help reduce the socio-economic disparities between the two sides, and it should therefore be considered as a positive step towards lifting the isolation of the Turkish Cypriots, as called for by my predecessor in his report of 28 May 2004 by which I stand.â€
As regards the presence of UNFICYP in Cyprus, Ban said that “the continued involvement of the international community in Cyprus, through UNFICYP, at least in its current form, should not be taken for granted,†adding that after 43 years of presence in Cyprus, the value added of UNFICYP, particularly in the absence of significant progress on the political process, is increasingly being questioned by various actors in the international community.
At the same time he noted that in the absence of a comprehensive settlement, the presence of UNFICYP on the island remains important and recommended that the Security Council extend the mandate of the Force by a period of six months, until 15 December 2007.