By Ali Erel
President,
Cyprus-EU Association
Â
The progress report on
On the eve of the approaching presidential and general elections in
The TRNC is defined by both the European Court of Human Rights and the EU as the “local subordinate administration of
Somehow, “Protocol 10” signed in the presence of the Turkish Prime Minister, is not  comprehended fully by the Turkish and the TRNC governments. Due to this protocol, which is part of the Act of Accession, which is a primary law of the EU, the whole of
The Council decision of April 26, 2004, which foresaw “the lifting of the economic isolation on the Turkish Cypriot community, to encourage the economic development of the Turkish Cypriot community with particular emphasis on the economic integration of the island and on improving contacts between the two communities and with the EU and to help to reunify the island” was also based on Protocol 10. Interestingly,
It should not be overlooked that the Green Line, Financial Aid and Direct Trade regulations were also based on Protocol 10. In this context; unfortunately the EU institutions have registered the fact that the Turkish Cypriot Chamber of Commerce and the TRNC administration are obstructing the proper functioning of the Green Line regulation. This observation will create difficulties for the EU to cooperate with the Turkish Cypriot institutions in future.Â
A proposal two years ago, by then the executive board of the Turkish Cypriot Chamber of Commerce that “the economic integration can only be achieved by the free movement of the goods overall the island” was rejected by the TRNC government and those who proposed it were declared to be “submissive”. But now, two years later, they are saying that “direct trade is of no use to us, we want free trade”. The cost of this delay is loss of two years to the community.
Even if the acquis is unilaterally applied in the northern part of the island, any package which does not foresee the inclusion of the Turkish Cypriots within the islandwide and the EU economic integration and the merger of the universities in north
On the other hand, to offer Varosha for resettlement under the TRNC laws as a goodwill gesture, is not the correct move. Making assumptions that the TRNC laws will be applicable for those who will resettle and invest in Varosha, when faced with the difficulties and questions about investments, bank loans and building permissions, municipal services, rent, sale and many other similar issues, is a grave mistake. This proposition is once again an indication that the consequences of Protocol 10, ECHR rulings and UN Security Council resolutions have not been fully understood or are being rejected.Â
The Turkish Cypriots are once again paying the price for the wrong political moves by the TRNC administration since the referendum. The EU institutions are now proposing direct trade, just to ease the pressure on